A EUPHEMISM ANALYSIS IN THE 2024 INDONESIAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DEBATE
Abstract
This study analyzes the use of euphemisms in the debate of the 2024 Indonesian presidential candidates. Candidates used euphemisms to discuss sensitive issues such as corruption, human rights, and social inequality without causing conflict or harming certain parties. Using a qualitative approach, data were taken from the transcript of the debate broadcast on the official YouTube channel of the Indonesian General Elections Commission (KPU RI). The euphemisms presented were based on Warren’s theory (1992), including derivation, compounding, and blending. The results showed that 15 euphemisms were identified from the debate; 8 derivations, 5 compoundings, and 2 blends, of which derivation was the most dominant euphemism. Euphemisms helped candidates convey criticism and sensitive issues more subtly, maintain their public image, and create a more friendly and non-confrontational debate atmosphere. Euphemisms are essential in political communication, especially in Indonesian culture, which priorities gentle and indirect communication. This study contributes to understanding how language can be used to influence public perception and voter decision-making in important political events.
References
Candra, S. I., Arifin, M. B., & Asanti, C. (2022). Euphemism Expressed by the Characters of Shakespeare in Love Movie Script. Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya, 6(1), 57-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v6i1.5097
Cao, Y. (2020). Analysis of pragmatic functions of English euphemism from the perspective of pragmatic principles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(9), 1094-1100. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1009.12
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2014). Euphemisms and political discourse in the British regional press. Brno studies in English, 40(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2014-1-1
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2018). Euphemism as a discursive strategy in US local and state politics. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(6), 789-811. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17040.cre
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd Edition). SAGE Publication Inc.
Cruse, A. (2006). A glossary of semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.1525
Deng, F. (2016). An analysis of phonetic formation in English euphemism. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3), 542. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0703.15
Enright, D. J. (ed.) (1985). Fair of speech: the uses of euphemism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jaganegara, H., & Wijana, I. D. P. (2023). Euphemism roles as a disguise tool in political texts: A case study of Tempo online political articles. SULUK: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15642/suluk.2023.5.1.1-19
Lingga, G. S., & Rangkuti, R. (2021). The analysis euphemism meaning in different genre texts. Wacana: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran, 19(2), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.33369/jwacana.v19i2.16549
Poole, S. C. (1999). An introduction to linguistics. London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27346-1
Rawson, H. (1995). A Dictionary of Euphemisms and Other Double Talk[M]. New York: Crown,1981:1-254. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.1525
Riabova, E., & Kobenko, Y. (2015). Onomatopoeia in the English and German nursery rhymes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.039
Syaharani, F. (2022). An Analysis of Euphemism Used in Online CNN Indonesia News (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Padang). https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v11i1.116445
Wang, X. D., Zhang, Y. X., Liu, B. G., Du, Z. J., & Li, H. Q. (2008). Crystallization behavior and crystal morphology of linear/long chain branching polypropylene blends. Polymer journal, 40(5), 450-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1607356
Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 6th ed.USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Warren, B. (1992). What euphemisms tell us about the interpretation of words. Studia linguistica, 46(2), 128-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1992.tb00833.x
Yildiz, F. U. (2021). Use of Euphemisms in Youth Language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17, 1117-1128. http://dx.doi.org/10.17263/jlls.904133
Yule, G. (2010). The study of language: 4th edition. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511757754
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the users or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.