THE EFFECT OF HEXAGON FRAUD ON FRAUD OF FINANCIAL REPORTS IN INDONESIA'S GO PUBLIC SOEs
Abstract
Financial statement fraud is a problem that often occurs in Indonesia and causes many losses. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to detect the emergence of potential fraud against financial statements using hexagon fraud analysis. Hexagon fraud analysis there are six dominant factors that can trigger the emergence of fraud against financial statements, namely pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance, and collusion. Pressure is projected with financial targets and personal financial needs, opportunities are projected with the nature of industry and audit quality, rationalization is projected with auditor opinions, the ability to be projected with CEO tenure, arrogance is projected with CEO duality and collusion is projected with political connection. The dependent variables in this study were measured using the F-Score Model to find out how much potential for fraud on financial statements. In this study, the population sample was determined by the criteria of state-owned companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, for the last 5 years, namely, 2017--2021 which have always reported their financial statements in rupiah. Quantitative methods are supported by panel data regression analysis techniques as well as hypothesis tests using the T test, as well as the determination coefficient test being the method used in this study. The results of this study show that financial targets, personal financial needs, nature of industry, audit quality, opinion auditors, CEO tenure, CEO duality and political connection have no influence on the potential emergence of fraud against financial statements.
References
Agusputri, H., dan Sofie, S. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Menggunakkan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, dan Keuangan Publik, 14(2), 105.
Ananta, Y. (2019). BPK Temukan Banyak Rekayasa dalam Lapkeu Garuda 2018.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2020). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. global fraud study. ACFE, 88.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia. ACFE Indonesia Chapter#111. ACFE
Bologna, J. (1993). Handbook on Corporate Fraud: Prevention, Detection, and Investigation. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Christian, N., dan Visakha, B. (2021). AnalisisTeori Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraud pada Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Dechow, P.M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., dan Sloan. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28 (1), 17-82.
Desviana, D., Basri, Y. M., & Nasrizal, N. (2020). Analisis Kecurangan pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 50-73.
Emalia, D. P. (2020). Dampak dari Auditor Quality, Financial Stability, dan Financial Target terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Studi Ilmu Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 1(1)., 1-11.
Faradiza, S. A. (2019). Fraud Pentagon dan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1-22.
Fimanaya, F., dan Syafruddin, M. . (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Non Keuangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008-2011). . Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3 (3)., 1-11.
Frymaruwah, E. (2020). Analsis Fraud Triangle Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Emiten Sektor Pertambangan. Jurnal Akuntanika, 6(2).
Horwath, C. (2011). The Mind Behind The Fraudsters Crime : Key Behavioral. Crowe Horwath LLP, 1-62.
Imitikhani, L., dan Sukirman. (2021). Determinan Fraudulent Financial Statement Melalui Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan. . Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis (Vol. 19, Issue 1).
Indriani, P. (2018). Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. 1- Finance: A Research Journal on Islamic Finance, 3 (2)., 161.
Jensen, M., C., dan William H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Volume 3, Issue 4,, 305-360.
Kusuma, H. (2019). Sri Mulyani Bekukan AKuntan Publik Kasner SIrumapea Mulai 27 Juli. .
Larum, K. Z. (2021). Fraudlent Financial Reporting: Menguji Potensi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan dengan Menggunakan Teori Fraud Hexagon. AFRE Accounting and Financial Review, 4(1)., 82-94.
Lestari A. A. M., dan Nuratama, I. P. . (2020). Pengaruh Financial Stability, External Pressure, Nature of Industry dan Rationalization Terhadap Financial Statement Frau Dalam Sudut Pandang Fraud Triangle Pada Perusahaan Sektor Real Estate and Property yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia 2014-2017. Hita Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 1 No.1.
Silaban, B. Z. (2021). Pengaruh Characteristic of Audit Committee, CEO Tenure, dan Arrogance Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. JIMEA Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, dan Akuntansi) 5 (3)., 994.
Skousen, C.J., Smith, K.R., dan Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Corporate Governance and Firm Perfomance Vol. 13, 55-81.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing Theory of Fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model. Journal of Financial Crime.
Wang, Z., Chen, M. H., Chin, C. L., dan Zheng, Q. (2017). Managerial ability, political connections, and fraudulent financial reporting in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 141-162.
Wicaksana, E. A., dan Suryandari, D. (2019). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Riset Akuntansi Keuangan, 4(1).
Yendrawati, R., Aulia, H., dan Prabowo, H. Y. (2019). Detecting The Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting: An Analysis of Fraud Diamond. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 14(1).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Makalah yang disampaikan diasumsikan tidak mengandung bahan proprietary yang tidak dilindungi oleh hak paten atau aplikasi paten; tanggung jawab untuk konten teknis dan untuk perlindungan dari bahan proprietary merupakan tanggung jawab penulis dan organisasi mereka dan bukan tanggung jawab dari Jurnal Parsimonia atau Staff Pengelolanya. Penulis utama (pertama/yang sesuai) bertanggung jawab untuk memastikan bahwa artikel tersebut telah dilihat dan disetujui oleh semua penulis lain. Hal ini merupakan tanggung jawab penulis untuk mendapatkan semua izin pelepasan hak cipta yang diperlukan untuk penggunaan setiap materi dalam naskah sebelum pengajuan.
